Safety on the Field: Reducing Concussion Related Injuries in High School Football

Recently, with more stories being brought to light, the public has been made aware of a growing problem among high school, college, and professional athletes; more specifically, football players. There have been numerous reports of injuries leading to concussions and the possible long-term effects that these traumas may create. While the National Football League has made some small changes to better protect their players, we can only assume that more can and should be done to protect the high school players. As they are still in their adolescence, these hopeful athletes are more susceptible to long-term damage caused by these concussions. It is in their best interest to create changes in the rules of the leagues, as well as heighten the safety measures taken with the equipment provided to them; possibly, creating local statutes to further enforce their protection.

When the National Football League introduced new regulations to prevent growing numbers of concussion-related injuries, fans argued that the game was changing significantly and was less exciting. Shortening the punt return distance, creating a smaller zone in which players may be tackled and similar rules were considered controversial and for many, unnecessary. People were not taking into account the dangers of concussions and how these changes would better serve the futures of the players. In high school football, universal changes are not that simple. Each league is governed by separate entities and follow their own set of regulations. This is why state statutes would provide the most far-reaching solution.

Parents and teachers need to step forward to advocate for stronger protective equipment. It is not an easy battle as funds are generally not readily available in our public schools. However, children's safety should hold precedence; if cuts need to be made to prevent traumatic brain injuries in sporting events, then that may be the only answer. Also, statewide regulations should govern the activity on the field. Prohibiting certain types of defensive strategy as well as altering the punt return process would greatly benefit the students. While no two states will have the same statutes, the leagues within the individual states certainly could. It is appalling to see how the wellbeing of the players is not considered of the utmost importance. There are ways to solve these problems, the issue is that nobody takes the initiative to do so. If statutes were put into place, it would not be a matter of inaction, it would be a violation of state law.

While this topic is heavily debated, the underlying concern is clear. Health and safety on the field should be a top priority. Fans may argue that the game should not be changed; that the new regulations are too "soft" and the thrill of watching is being diminished. I find this very difficult to accept as a counterargument, as nobody wants to watch a player sustain a serious injury. No parent wants to see their child suffer the consequences of repeat concussions. Injuries in contact sports are not preventable altogether, but they can be limited. We can move toward a goal of reduced concussion-related traumas, and higher standards set by the states, the leagues, and the individual schools. Helmet safety needs to be scrutinized and every measure should be taken to ensure that the students are being protected at the highest level. Eliminating helmet-to-helmet contact is simply not enough, stringent regulations must be put into place and adhered to.